Head-to-head

Fly.io vs DigitalOcean

Two hosts, side by side. Pricing, features, and the trade-offs that actually matter.

Fly.io from Free

Run small full-stack apps in dozens of regions for genuinely low cost — when it works.

HQ US · founded 2017
DigitalOcean from $6/mo

The original developer-friendly VPS — now with a full PaaS layer on top.

HQ US · founded 2011

Quick verdict

Cheapest: Fly.io wins on entry price (Free vs $6/mo).
More features: DigitalOcean ships more first-party platform features out of the box.
Region: Fly.io is HQ'd in US; DigitalOcean in US.

Cheapest plans, side by side

Fly.ioDigitalOcean
Entry planFree (3× shared-cpu-1x)Basic 1 GB
PriceFree$6/mo
CPU1 vCPU1 vCPU (shared)
RAM0.25 GB1 GB
Disk3 GB25 GB
Bandwidth160 GB1 TB

Feature parity

Fly.ioDigitalOcean
Managed Postgres
Managed Redis
Object storage
One-click apps×
Private network
IPv6
DDoS protection
Snapshots
Public API
Terraform

Fly.io pros

  • +35+ regions, deploy multi-region with one command
  • +Run any Docker image — no platform-specific buildpacks
  • +Generous always-free tier (3 small machines)

Fly.io cons

  • Reliability has been bumpy across 2023–2025; status page tells the story
  • Support is community-first — paid support tiers exist but are light
  • Some primitives (volumes, secrets) have rough edges that bite production apps

DigitalOcean pros

  • +Best documentation in the industry by a wide margin
  • +Managed Postgres, MySQL, Redis, Mongo, Kafka — all first-party
  • +App Platform (Heroku-style git push) on the same dashboard as droplets

DigitalOcean cons

  • Roughly 2× the price of Hetzner for equivalent compute
  • Bandwidth overage charges hit hard once you exceed the bundled allotment
  • Some regions (Sydney, Bangalore) have noticeably slower disk than NYC/AMS