paasstaticserverless HQ US · est. 2014

Netlify

Vercel's older sibling — broader framework support, more even-keeled pricing.

Netlify started the JAMstack movement and remains the most framework-agnostic of the modern PaaS-for-frontend hosts. SvelteKit, Astro, Eleventy, Hugo, Next.js — they all "just work" with sensible defaults. The free Starter tier allows commercial use, which Vercel's Hobby tier explicitly doesn't.

For static sites and lightly-dynamic apps, Netlify and Vercel are interchangeable; pick the one whose ecosystem fits. For Next.js-heavy stacks, Vercel pulls ahead. For a designer or content team using a non-Next.js framework, Netlify is friendlier.

Pros & cons

What works
  • + First-class support for many SSGs, not just Next.js
  • + Forms, identity, and Edge Functions wrapped into one bill
  • + Free tier is generous and commercial use is allowed
  • + Atomic deploys with instant rollback
What doesn't
  • Build minute overages bite for monorepos
  • Functions are AWS Lambda under the hood; cold starts apply
  • Less aggressive at frontier features than Vercel — you'll lag on cutting-edge framework support

Plans & pricing

PlanPriceCPURAMDiskBandwidth
Starter
100 GB bandwidth + 300 build minutes
Free0 GB— GB100 GB
Pro
per seat
$19/mo0 GB— GB1 TB

Free tier: 100 GB bandwidth, 300 build minutes, commercial use allowed

Features at a glance

× IPv6
× Snapshots
DDoS protection
× Private network
× Object storage
× Managed Postgres
× Managed Redis
One-click apps
Public API
× Terraform provider
Backups: none

Netlify head-to-head

Side-by-side comparisons against the hosts indie devs most often weigh Netlify against.

Similar hosts