Head-to-head

Fly.io vs Render

Two hosts, side by side. Pricing, features, and the trade-offs that actually matter.

Fly.io from Free

Run small full-stack apps in dozens of regions for genuinely low cost — when it works.

HQ US · founded 2017
Render from Free

Heroku alternative with predictable per-service pricing.

HQ US · founded 2018

Quick verdict

Cheapest: Render wins on entry price (Free vs Free).
More features: Fly.io ships more first-party platform features out of the box.
Region: Fly.io is HQ'd in US; Render in US.

Cheapest plans, side by side

Fly.ioRender
Entry planFree (3× shared-cpu-1x)Free Web
PriceFreeFree
CPU1 vCPU0.1 vCPU
RAM0.25 GB0.5 GB
Disk3 GB— GB
Bandwidth160 GB100 GB

Feature parity

Fly.ioRender
Managed Postgres
Managed Redis
Object storage×
One-click apps×
Private network
IPv6×
DDoS protection
Snapshots×
Public API
Terraform×

Fly.io pros

  • +35+ regions, deploy multi-region with one command
  • +Run any Docker image — no platform-specific buildpacks
  • +Generous always-free tier (3 small machines)

Fly.io cons

  • Reliability has been bumpy across 2023–2025; status page tells the story
  • Support is community-first — paid support tiers exist but are light
  • Some primitives (volumes, secrets) have rough edges that bite production apps

Render pros

  • +Predictable per-service pricing instead of mystery usage bills
  • +Free tier for static sites and Postgres (with caveats)
  • +Supports cron jobs, background workers, private services

Render cons

  • Free Postgres expires after 90 days unless upgraded
  • Cold starts on the free web service tier are very real
  • Free tier has been progressively trimmed since 2023; check current limits before betting on it