paas HQ US · est. 2018

Render

Heroku alternative with predictable per-service pricing.

Render aims for the "predictable Heroku" niche: per-service pricing, no usage surprises, but with the modern niceties (zero-downtime deploys, preview environments, private networks). For a typical Django + Postgres + Redis SaaS, the bill is more predictable than Railway's metered model.

Their free tier is the well-known caveat: free web services spin down after 15 minutes of inactivity (causing 30+ second cold starts), and free Postgres databases delete after 90 days. As a free-forever host, those limits mean it's good for portfolios and prototypes, not production. As a $25–50/month tier, it's a reasonable Heroku replacement.

Pros & cons

What works
  • + Predictable per-service pricing instead of mystery usage bills
  • + Free tier for static sites and Postgres (with caveats)
  • + Supports cron jobs, background workers, private services
  • + Zero-downtime deploys, preview environments
What doesn't
  • Free Postgres expires after 90 days unless upgraded
  • Cold starts on the free web service tier are very real
  • Free tier has been progressively trimmed since 2023; check current limits before betting on it
  • Pricing for production-grade plans isn't especially cheap

Plans & pricing

PlanPriceCPURAMDiskBandwidth
Free Web
spins down after 15 min idle
Free0.1 vCPU0.5 GB— GB100 GB
Starter $7/mo0.5 vCPU0.5 GB— GB100 GB
Standard $25/mo1 vCPU2 GB— GB100 GB

Features at a glance

× IPv6
× Snapshots
DDoS protection
Private network
× Object storage
Managed Postgres
Managed Redis
One-click apps
Public API
× Terraform provider
Backups: paid

Render head-to-head

Side-by-side comparisons against the hosts indie devs most often weigh Render against.

Similar hosts